I like poster sessions

Martin Fenner
June 4, 2008 1 min read

As I said before ( on this blog, I do like poster sessions. The poster sessions at the just finished American Society of Clinical Oncology ( meeting didn't offer food and drink, but were otherwise very enjoyable. The meeting is probably special because a lot of high quality research will be presented as poster, as there is just not enough time for enough oral sessions. Many of the poster presenters were senior faculty. I also like the printouts that were available from most posters – but there still was a lot of picture taking with digital cameras. A very good feature was the oral summary of some of the poster sessions: 15 minute presentations of 5-10 posters, summarized and commented on by an expert in the field.

I had some very informative discussions with a number of poster presenters. When you are familiar with the research topic it is often possible to go straight to the interesting issues, the nonlinear and interactive format of a poster is then often better than an oral presentation. The downside of a poster presentation is obviously that the format is good for presenting to a small audience only. But the poster presenter will usually get much more feedback than from an oral presentation.

(n.d.-a). In Retrieved February 21, 2021, from
(n.d.-b). In Retrieved February 21, 2021, from e-Print archive. (2016). In
caBIG. (2015). In
F1000 launches fast, open science publishing for biology and medicine : News blog. (2016). In
Fenner, M. (2013). What Can Article-Level Metrics Do for You? PLOS Biology, 11(10), e1001687.
Home : Nature Precedings. (2016). In
In which I suggest a preprint archive for clinical trials Gobbledygook. (2016). In
Twitter. It’s what’s happening. (2016). In

Other Formats